©
2001 Jason Colavito
On a dusty speck of rock in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, one of the most
celebrated cultures in history found a foot-hold into the popular imagination.
The inhabitants of Easter Island created a cultural legacy that continues to
resonate today as tourists flock to the tiny Chilean possession to see for
themselves the impressive and distinctive statues, called Moai, which dot the
landscape and stare with empty eyes toward the endless ocean. They stand on
platform temples, called Ahu, which the islanders built up and enlarged over
the course of centuries. Tourists are astounded by the fine craftsmanship and
breath-taking beauty of Easter Island. Many believe a great mystery lies
hidden there.
Alternative history author
Graham Hancock believes that Easter Island is a focal point for a
vanished civilization whose influence stretches across millennia:
"The mystery of Easter Island so far seems to have involved... the mystery of
the master architects who first conceived the great Ahu and Moai [and] the
mystery of the master scribes who understood the Rongorongo language," he
wrote in Heaven's Mirror (1998).
Decades ago, anthropologist Robert Suggs wrote a history of Polynesia that was
a standard text on the subject. He firmly believed that archaeology had solved
most of the island's puzzles: "The mystery of this island, then, is largely of
an artificial nature, created for specific purposes by nonscientific authors."
He implied that those authors seek only fame and fortune, not truth. For that
reason, they obscure the history of the famous Moai.
The Moai of Easter Island are usually dated to the period between A.D. 1200 -
1650, and are considered a late addition to the Ahu platforms, which
originated with the founding of Easter Island. When I asked Graham Hancock to
comment on the age of the statues, he told me in August 2001 that the
archaeological dating is "probably correct as far as it goes, though not
necessarily the whole story." He referred me to Heaven's Mirror for a
full explanation of his views, so it is from their that I quote...

View: