The following are excerpts of
conversations from Apollo Astronauts on the Moon to Mission Control - which show
that the Astronauts came across some strange and hard-to-explain structures and
unusual sightings of unidentified craft - whilst on the surface of the Moon. In
the photo to the left, you can see an Apollo astronaut on the
Moon. In the background, space, the final frontier. Or is it a Hollywood
backdrop, the ultimate deception? Many people feel we have not been told the
complete truth regarding NASA's space program, in particular the Apollo Missions
of the late 60's and early 70's. Recent research has shown that conditions on
the Moon could be very different from the 'official-line' which NASA would lead
us to believe. Dr Farouk El Baz, one of NASA's foremost scientists, confirmed
public suspicions when he stated 'not every discovery has been announced to
Is this the understatement of
the millennium? Why is it that relatively few people have been allowed total
access to the massive NASA archives (photographs which are supposedly in the
public domain). Instead we have to make do with the two or three dozen
'reproductions' that appear in the 'official' textbooks, despite literally
millions of photographic images obtained by NASA. Something is seriously amiss.
Also the original photographs are huge (32"x24") so by the time they have been
reduced to fit the pages of a regular book the clarity and quality reduced by
the copying process make most of the images pretty meaningless. In many cases,
researchers are left with little more than 'smudges' and 'blurs'.
Even so, despite all these
obstacles, there is still hard evidence when these photographs are scrutinized
under the proverbial - and literal - microscope, that points to the fact that
virtually everything NASA has told us about the moon is a lie. The REAL NASA
MOON PHOTOS, for example show all kinds of structures, seemingly both old and
new, such as domes, pipelines, and even pyramids. So why aren't these photos in
the public domain? ...
Apollo Moon Landing Fake? Did NASA REALLY put a man
on the moon?! And why
haven't we been back to the moon in 35 years?
Shocking : See what NASA has
done (Long but worth reading)
Did man really walk on the Moon or was it the ultimate camera trick, asks David
In the early hours of May 16, 1990, after a week spent watching old video
footage of man on the Moon, a thought was turning into an obsession in the mind
of Ralph Rene.
"How can the flag be fluttering?" the 47 year old American kept asking himself
when there's no wind on the atmosphere free Moon? That moment was to be the
beginning of an incredible Space odyssey for the self- taught engineer from New
He started investigating the Apollo Moon landings, scouring every NASA film,
photo and report with a growing sense of wonder, until finally reaching an
awesome conclusion: America had never put a man on the Moon. The giant leap for
mankind was fake!!!!!
It is of course the conspiracy theory to end all conspiracy theories. But Rene
has now put all his findings into a startling book entitled NASA Mooned America.
Published by himself, it's being sold by mail order - and is a compelling read.
The story lifts off in 1961 with Russia firing Yuri Gagarin into space, leaving
a panicked America trailing in the space race. At an emergency meeting of
Congress, President Kennedy proposed the ultimate face saver, put a man on the
Moon. With an impassioned speech he secured the plan an unbelievable 40 billion
And so, says Rene (and a growing number of astro-physicists are beginning to
agree with him), the great Moon hoax was born. Between 1969 and 1972, seven
Apollo ships headed to the Moon. Six claim to have made it, with the ill fated
Apollo 13 - whose oxygen tanks apparently exploded halfway being the only
casualties. But with the exception of the known rocks, which could have been
easily mocked up in a lab, the photographs and film footage are the only proof
that the Eagle ever landed. And Rene believes they're fake.
For a start, he says, the TV footage was hopeless. The world tuned in to watch
what looked like two blurred white ghosts throw rocks and dust. Part of the
reason for the low quality was that, strangely, NASA provided no direct link up.
So networks actually had to film man's greatest achievement from a TV screen in
Houston - a deliberate ploy, says Rene, so that nobody could properly examine
it. By contrast, the still photos were stunning. Yet that's just the problem.
The astronauts took thousands of pictures, each one perfectly exposed and
sharply focused. Not one was badly composed or even blurred.
As Rene points out, that's not all: The cameras had no white meters or view
ponders. So the astronauts achieved this feet without being able to see what
they were doing. There film stock was unaffected by the intense peaks and
powerful cosmic radiation on the Moon, conditions that should have made it
useless. They managed to adjust their cameras, change film and swap filters in
pressurized suits. It should have been almost impossible with the gloves on
their fingers. Award winning British photographer David Persey is convinced the
pictures are fake. His astonishing findings are explained alongside the pictures
on these pages, but the basic points are as follows: The shadows could only have
been created with multiple light sources and,in particular, powerful spotlights.
But the only light source on the Moon was the sun. The American flag and the words
"United States" are always Brightly lit, even when everything around is in
shadow. Not one still picture matches the film footage, yet NASA claims both
were shot at the same time. The pictures are so perfect, each one would have
taken a slick advertising agency hours to put them together. But the astronauts
managed it repeatedly. David Persey believes the mistakes were deliberate, left
there by "whistle blowers" who were keen for the truth to one day get out. If
Persey is right and the pictures are fake, then we've only NASA's word that man
ever went to the Moon. And, asks Rene, "Why would anyone fake pictures of an
event that actually happened?"
Is there an "Alien Base" on the Moon? More and
more people are coming forward with stories of an Alien presence on the Moon.
Rumors say that there is an Alien Moon Base on the far side of the moon, the
side we never see from Earth. Did you ever wonder why the Moon landings
stopped and why we have not tried to build a Moon Base? It does seem like a
better and easier idea than a floating space station with no access to any raw
materials or supplies? According to the NASA Astronaut Neil Armstrong the
Aliens have a base on the Moon and told us in no uncertain terms to get off
and stay off the Moon! Sound far fetched? Milton Cooper a Naval
Intelligence Officer tell us that not only does the Alien Moon Base exist but
the U.S. Naval Intelligence Community refers to the Alien Moon Base as "Luna",
that there is a huge mining operation going on there, and that is where the
Aliens keep their huge mother ships while the trips to Earth are made in
smaller "flying saucers".
LUNA: The Alien base on the far side of the
Moon. It was seen and filmed by the Apollo Astronauts. A base, a mining
operation using very large machines, and the very large alien craft described
in sighting reports as mother ships exist there. - Milton Cooper. Did Apollo 11 Encounter UFOs on the Moon? from
the Book "Above Top Secret" by Timothy Good . According to hitherto unconfirmed reports,
both Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin saw UFOs shortly after that
historic landing on the Moon in Apollo 11 on 21 July 1969. I remember hearing
one of the astronauts refer to a "light" in or on a carter during the
television transmission, followed by a request from mission control for
further information. Nothing more was heard. According to a former NASA
employee Otto Binder, unnamed radio hams with their own VHF receiving
facilities that bypassed NASA's broadcasting outlets picked up the following
The full moon has been linked to crime,
suicide, mental illness, disasters, accidents, birthrates, fertility, and
werewolves, among other things. Some people even buy and sell stocks according
to phases of the moon, a method probably as successful as many others. Numerous
studies have tried to find lunar effects. So far, the studies have failed to
establish much of interest. Lunar effects that have been found have little or
nothing to do with human behavior, e.g., the discovery of a slight effect of the
moon on global temperature,* which in turn might have an effect on the growth of
plants. Of course, there have been single studies here and there that have found
correlations between various phases of the moon and this or that phenomenon, but
nothing significant has been replicated sufficiently to warrant claiming a
probable causal relationship.
Ivan Kelly, James Rotton and Roger
Culver (1996) examined over 100 studies on lunar effects and concluded that the
studies have failed to show a reliable and significant correlation (i.e., one
not likely due to chance) between the full moon, or any other phase of the moon,
and each of the following: the homicide rate, traffic accidents, -crisis calls
to police or fire stations, domestic violence, births of babies, suicide, major
disasters, casino payout rates, assassinations, kidnappings, aggression by
professional hockey players, violence in prisons, psychiatric admissions [one
study found admissions were lowest during a full moon], agitated behavior by
nursing home residents, assaults, gunshot wounds, stabbings, emergency room
admissions, behavioral outbursts of psychologically challenged rural adults,
lycanthropy, vampirism, alcoholism, sleep walking, epilepsy. If so many studies
have failed to prove a significant correlation between the full moon and
anything, why do so many people believe in these lunar myths? Kelly, Rotton, and
Culver suspect four factors: media effects, folklore and tradition,
misconceptions, and cognitive biases. A fifth factor should be considered, as
well communal reinforcement...